Archive for October, 2009

The earliest painting of a telescope

Monday, October 19th, 2009

A couple of weeks ago I wrote a post about an astronomer who’s been attempting to date and place several paintings by looking for clues in astronomical events they depict. I mentioned I’d be doing a follow-up soon, and here it is, albeit somewhat later than I expected.

Around the same time as the Guardian article which inspired my last post I saw this paper presented by Selvelli and Molaro at a conference celebrating four centuries of astronomical telescopes. But this time the stars (so to speak) of the story are not objects in the night sky - they’re the telescopes themselves.

(more…)

Supercomputers and gravity

Saturday, October 17th, 2009

Astronomers, as everyone knows, use telescopes to do their work. But not all astronomy is done using telescopes - there are in fact many astronomers who never make use of them. I’m one of them; I work mostly with computer simulations. Since people are often surprised to hear how much astronomy is done by computer, I thought I’d dedicate a post to talking about what an astronomical simulation is, how they’re used, and how important they are.


The goal of astronomy, like any science, is to produce models of the world - or certain aspects of it - which explain it as well and as simply as possible. A scientific model begins with an observation of some phenomenon and an idea for a rule or law which could explain it. For example, Tycho Brahe made a series of painstaking observations of the motion of the planets over many years, which his student Kepler explained using a set of three laws of planetary motion. These in turn allowed Newton to develop his law of gravitation.

The aim of a theory though is to be able to make predictions about other observations yet to be made. That’s partly because we’d like our science to be useful, to tell us what to expect tomorrow as well as to explain what happened yesterday. But it’s also for the theory’s own good. Every prediction which turns out to be correct is another piece of evidence in its favour (as when Herschel discovered Uranus in 1781, and its motion was found to obey the same laws Kepler had derived previously). And every prediction which is false tells us we must be missing some data (as when irregularities in Uranus’s orbit compared to theory suggested the presence of another planet, Neptune, beyond it) or that our theory needs to be refined or replaced (as with changes in Mercury’s orbit not due to any known planet, which are now explained brilliantly by General Relativity).

(more…)

Tuesday picture: Saturn’s largest ring

Tuesday, October 13th, 2009

ResearchBlogging.org

It’s been a good couple of weeks for Solar System news, it seems. After the recent excitement about traces of water on the Moon, this week a team has published (Verbiscer et al.) their discovery of a new ring around Saturn.

Here’s an artist’s impression of the ring, shown to scale with Saturn and its more familiar ring system: as you can see, they’re pretty dwarfed by the newcomer.

Artist's impression of the Phoebe Ring with Saturn to scale. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Keck.

Artist's impression of the Phoebe Ring with Saturn to scale. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Keck.

(more…)

Tuesday picture: the Eagle Nebula

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009

I’m a little snowed under this week, both with new projects at work and with finishing off the paper I mentioned I’ve been working on. So today’s picture comes with less explanation but I hope you’ll agree it’s striking enough on its own.

The Eagle Nebula

The Eagle Nebula

This is the Eagle Nebula photographed by Hubble. If that sounds familiar it means you’ve been paying attention: I showed a much smaller detail of the gas cloud a couple of months ago. I said the pillars had been ‘carved’ by radiation from new stars forming in the cloud: the same is true for the whole beautiful cave-like structure you can see here.

Those ‘Pillars of Creation’ which were a whopping 5 light-years or 30,000 billion miles long appear so small in the centre of this larger picture they’re easy to miss. To help you find them, here’s a blow-up of the middle half of this image: the Pillars are marked by the smaller of the two green boxes.